Gardner Selby November 30, Read About Our Process. Jeff Wentworth stated on May 9, a TV ad. Says he "restored prayer and the pledge in our schools. Ron Davis stated on March 1, a campaign flier:.
Says "over 40 percent of recent county bonds are for Precinct One, northeast Travis County," because he "is quick to identify projects that help make the East Side a desirable place to live. Brigid Shea stated on May 7, a campaign mailer. Says Lee Leffingwell "raised property taxes 20 percent in three years. Donna Howard stated on March 24, remarks at a Texas Capitol rally:. David Dewhurst stated on April 13, a Republican U. Senate debate:. Says that when adjusted for inflation and population growth, state general revenue spending has decreased Charlie Gonzalez stated on March 27, a conference call:.
David Dewhurst stated on April 4, an online video:. Rosemary Lehmberg stated on October 31, campaign video:. Says she "created the first felony deferred prosecution program for nonviolent first-offenders" in Texas. Elliott Naishtat stated on March 5, an op-ed column:. Although these findings need to be confirmed in humans, the implications of this finding are staggering, as all vaccines authorized for emergency use are based on the delivery or induction of Spike glycoprotein synthesis.
In the case of mRNA vaccines and adenovirus-vectorized vaccines, not a single study has examined the duration of Spike production in humans following vaccination. If so, the true adverse effects of the current global vaccination strategy may never be recognized unless studies specifically examine this question.
There is already non-causal evidence of temporary or sustained increases in COVID deaths following vaccination in some countries Fig. SARS-CoV-2 has numerous immunogenic proteins, and all but one of its immunogenic epitopes have similarities to human proteins [27]. These may act as a source of antigens, leading to autoimmunity [28]. Michael Ryan, head of emergencies at the World Health Organization. We have been unable to find evidence that any of the currently authorized vaccines screened and excluded homologous immunogenic epitopes to avoid potential autoimmunity due to pathogenic priming.
Some adverse reactions, including blood-clotting disorders, have already been reported in healthy and young vaccinated people. These cases led to the suspension or cancellation of the use of adenoviral vectorized ChAdOx1-nCov and Janssen vaccinesin some countries. It has now been proposed that vaccination with ChAdOx1-nCov can result in immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia VITT mediated by platelet-activating antibodies against Platelet factor-4, which clinically mimics autoimmune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia [29].
Unfortunately, the risk was overlooked when authorizing these vaccines, although adenovirus-induced thrombocytopenia has been known for more than a decade, and has been a consistent event with adenoviral vectors [30]. The risk of VITT would presumably be higher in those already at risk of blood clots, including women who use oral contraceptives [31], making it imperative for clinicians to advise their patients accordingly.
At the population level, there could also be vaccine-related impacts. SARS-CoV-2 is a fast-evolving RNA virus that has so far produced more than 40, variants [32,33] some of which affect the antigenic domain of Spike glycoprotein [34,35]. It is unknown to what extent mutations that affect SARS-CoV-2 antigenicity will become fixed during viral evolution [39], but vaccines could plausibly act as selective forces driving variants with higher infectivity or transmissibility.
Considering the high similarity between known SARS-CoV-2 variants, this scenario is unlikely [32,34] but if future variants were to differ more in key epitopes, the global vaccination strategy might have helped shape an even more dangerous virus.
This risk has recently been brought to the attention of the WHO as an open letter [40]. Evidence on the safety of all SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is needed before exposing more people to the risk of these experiments, since releasing a candidate vaccine without time to fully understand the resulting impact on health could lead to an exacerbation of the current global crisis [41].
Risk-stratification of vaccine recipients is essential. However, according to Eudravigillance, most of the serious adverse effects following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination occur in people aged Of particular concern is the planned vaccination schedule for children aged 6 years and older in the United States and the UK.
Anthony Fauci recently anticipated that teenagers across the country will be vaccinated in the autumn and younger children in early , and the UK is awaiting trial results to commence vaccination of 11 million children under There is a lack of scientific justification for subjecting healthy children to experimental vaccines, given that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that they have a Not only is COVID irrelevant as a threat to this age group, but there is no reliable evidence to support vaccine efficacy or effectiveness in this population or to rule out harmful side effects of these experimental vaccines.
In this sense, when physicians advise patients on the elective administration of COVID vaccination, there is a great need to better understand the benefits and risk of administration, particularly in understudied groups. In conclusion, in the context of the rushed emergency-use-authorization of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, and the current gaps in our understanding of their safety, the following questions must be raised:.
In the context of these concerns, we propose halting mass-vaccination and opening an urgent pluralistic, critical, and scientifically-based dialogue on SARS-CoV-2 vaccination among scientists, medical doctors, international health agencies, regulatory authorities, governments, and vaccine developers. This is the only way to bridge the current gap between scientific evidence and public health policy regarding the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.
We are convinced that humanity deserves a deeper understanding of the risks than what is currently touted as the official position. An open scientific dialogue is urgent and indispensable to avoid erosion of public confidence in science and public health and to ensure that the WHO and national health authorities protect the interests of humanity during the current pandemic. Returning public health policy to evidence-based medicine, relying on a careful evaluation of the relevant scientific research, is urgent.
It is imperative to follow the science. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. Like Like. We are being forced at mercy to take the vaccine or we will be fired II go against the vaccine the vaccine what is there that we can do.
There is so much mis- and disinformation on the subject. That is critical as it has been affecting our public policies. And the variants are, excuse me, almost invariably weaker— transmission is easier with a weaker virus too much to explain that seemingly contradictory statment here. The mortality death rates are already showing this to be true. I could go on, but you get the picture.
But its McihaelB. In my opinion, these individuals should be subjected to international Law, the full weight of it in human rights courts to answer for their clear violations, and also should stand trial for high treason in their respective countries.
Well hello Chad. You said riiiight. Like Liked by 1 person. Would like to have read this and understood it better with explanations to medical terms for those of us who do not have a medical degree.
I am college degreed but am trying to decide if I will get the vaccine or not as many of my friends and family and neighbors have contracted it, and I have personally known 10 who have died from it. I am a researcher, but I found this only written for the medically knowledgeable. I actually looked up the credentials on some of them.. They are what they say they are….
But, If I do not want to take an experimental vaccine, I should be able to do that too. What makes un-vaccinated people a risk to the vaccinated anyway? Vaccinated people can transmit the new Delta Variant just like the un-vaccinated…no difference. And, they can get the Delta Variant and they can die from the Delta Variant.
I feel like this is a personal choice. I read that you can help detox with N. What makes unvaccinated people a threat to vaccinated people is this. A US vet died because he waited 7 hours in an ER for a bed because the hospital was at capacity with Covid patients. They called looking for a hospital with a bed that could take him and give him the 30 minute procedure that would have saved his life.
By the time they found one some 4 hours away it was too late. He died on the way there. Killed by the very people he fought to protect. The cdc stopped the reporting of vaxed patients being in hospitals as of May 1st.
My rn wife will tell you that most of the icu patients are older vaxed people now. Clarissa, is that a hearsay or you were a case manager for that patient?? I guarantee you that most people you ask will have the same experience. So pleeeaaase spare us the pity story. Our vets are one of our most prized possessions and deserve every help possible but it makes me sick to see them used as pawns to spread fear into the very people they served to protect!!
Clarisa, you have misplaced anger on the unvaccinated when the real problem was that our government never allowed information to come out about drugs and vitamins that could be taken early to prevent the worst outcomes of Covid and keep everyone out of the hospital. Nobody is in the ICU at this lever. An ivermectin protocol right after testing positive for Covid helped clear out hospitals in Mexico in Jan Then same thing happened in states in India that chose to use it.
US government and big pharma have to make sure no early treatments are known to protect their emergency Use authorization for vaccines. It is illegal if a safe effective alternative exists. Can you imagine if I said that I think one left to go. Alaska and Hawaii, I was not allowed to go to even though I really wanted to visit, but my staff would not justify it. Speaking with reporters after the rally, Obama was concerned that he had accidentally also misstated the number of potential victims following a cyclone in Burma.
It's a sign that my numeracy is getting a little, uh. Obama had been on the campaign trail for 16 months at that point and he was rebuked in the media and online for his remark, the Times noted. Suitably Flip blog, a campaign website at the time, unveiled an American flag lapel pin with 57 stars. They began selling the pins to mock the Harvard-educated then-senator from Illinois over his mistake. Trump was part of the "birther" movement against Obama, claiming for years that the former president was born outside of the U.
Obama eventually released his birth certificate to counter the claims.
0コメント